<!--
Before you open the request please review the following guidelines and tips to help it be more easily integrated:
- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does.
- Describe any known limitations with your change.
- Please run any tests or examples that can exercise your modified code.
Thank you for contributing! We will try to review, test and integrate the change as soon as we can.
-->
### Description of the change
<!-- Describe the scope of your change - i.e. what the change does. -->
### Benefits
<!-- What benefits will be realized by the code change? -->
### Possible drawbacks
<!-- Describe any known limitations with your change -->
### Applicable issues
<!-- Enter any applicable Issues here (You can reference an issue using #). Please remove this section if there is no referenced issue. -->
- Fixes #
### Additional information
<!-- If there's anything else that's important and relevant to your pull request, mention that information here. Please remove this section if it remains empty. -->
### ⚠ BREAKING
<!-- If there's a breaking change, please shortly describe in which way users are affected and how they can mitigate it. If there are no breakings, please remove this section. -->
### Checklist
<!-- [Place an '[X]' (no spaces) in all applicable fields. Please remove unrelated fields.] -->
- [ ] Parameters are documented in the `values.yaml` and added to the `README.md` using [readme-generator-for-helm](https://github.com/bitnami-labs/readme-generator-for-helm)
- [ ] Breaking changes are documented in the `README.md`
- [ ] Helm templating unittests are added (required when changing anything in `templates` folder)
- [ ] Bash unittests are added (required when changing anything in `scripts` folder)
- [ ] All added template resources MUST render a namespace in metadata
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/pulls/116
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Daan Selen <dselen@nerthus.nl>
Co-committed-by: Daan Selen <dselen@nerthus.nl>
_This is the first time I ever messed with helm and is an experiment to show what prevents the tests to pass and how far it still depends on the gitea chart_
### Description of the change
- Deletes a single test that seems to depend directly on gitea
- make all tests pass
- Moves all value accesses from `actions` one level up
- Copies content of the gitea chart required by the existing test
- Reveals all dependencies that needs to be decoupled
- Fixes readme generation
- add package.json
- copy dependent readme section from helm-gitea
- Removes all dependencies
- giteaRootURL is now required to be provided
- consistency check that this value has been provided
- added test for consistency failure
- nc command no longer uses an hardcoded dns name and is checked in tests
- added test
- Copied yamllint from helm-gitea
- added pnpm lock file exclusion
- Installed pnpm in the workflow
- Updated make unittest command in CI to unittest-helm
### Benefits
The existing tests are passing
### Possible drawbacks
The provision job might still not work.
### Applicable issues
- Fixes#5
### Additional information
The following usage should now deploy
```yaml
existingSecret: "somesecret"
existingSecretKey: "key"
## Specify the root URL of the Gitea instance
giteaRootURL: "http://somedomain:3000"
```
### ⚠ BREAKING
- giteaRootURL is now required to be provided
- Moves all value accesses from `actions` one level up
- The values.yml had this change without updating tests / dev Readme
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/helm-actions/pulls/6
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: justusbunsi <justusbunsi@noreply.gitea.com>
Reviewed-by: volker.raschek <markus.pesch@web.de>
Co-authored-by: Christopher Homberger <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-committed-by: Christopher Homberger <christopher.homberger@web.de>