Dustin J. Mitchell 4029c03479 Support sequential consistency in SQLite implementation (#64) ...

This is a bit tricky because the `Storage` trait is `Send + Sync`, but
an SQLite connection is neither. Since this is not intended for
large-scale use, the simple solution is just to open a new SQLite
connection for each transaction. More complex alternatives include
thread-local connection pools or a "worker thread" that owns the
connection and communicates with other threads via channels.

This also updates the InMemoryStorage implementation to be a bit more
strict about transactional integrity, which led to a number of test
changes.

2024-11-26 16:22:35 -05:00

..

concurrency.rs

Support sequential consistency in SQLite implementation (#64)

2024-11-26 16:22:35 -05:00